Are 'Documentary Films' entirely 'Work of Art'?
Are 'Documentary Films' entirely 'Work of Art'?
~ Documentary Films are not entirely Work of Art ~ Documentary Films, strictly speaking, are non-fictional, "slice of life" factual works of art - and sometimes known as 'cinema verite'. For many years, as films became more narrative-based, documentaries branched out and took many forms since their early beginnings - some of which have been termed propagandistic or non-objective. But, still, Documentary Films are not entirely Work of Art, with the sole exceptions of a Night and Fog, a Robert Flaherty, A Man with a Movie Camera, A Land Without Bread, A Last Waltz, A Koyaanisqatsi, A Baraka, A View from a Grain of Sand, or Avenge, but One of My Two Eyes.
~ The dilemma is that everybody is a documentary filmmaker now; anybody with a movie camera could produce documentary films. The World is full of subjects and topics, howling to be heard, struggling to be seen. But are the 'results' and 'representations' truly Artistic? People fail to distinguish between the 'propagandistic' manoeuvrings and sublime and noble Art. It's high time we change the name to "Propaganda Films", and never associate the term "Art" with the Documentary Genre.
0 comments:
Post a Comment